This page is an English summary of a reposted Chinese article from itrewub/jh-notes. The original article is stored here for study and is licensed under CC0 1.0.

Tags: Clan

Summary

This article argues that modern Chinese language ability is not primarily about writing poetry or literary prose. Its first function is practical: explaining matters, giving reasons, expressing plans, and reducing ambiguity and misunderstanding in cooperation.

The central claim is severe but clear: language ability is the foundation of all other abilities. A person who gives up on improving expression has already pushed communication costs onto everyone else.

The article’s first lesson is to abandon the fantasy that one can simply be “bad at expression” and still expect full understanding from others. Expression is treated as a responsibility.

The second lesson is to accept technical responsibility for communication failure. If others do not understand, misunderstand, or cannot receive what was said, then from a technical perspective the expression has failed. This does not mean every conversation is worth further investment, but it does mean that the speaker should be able to review and improve their expression instead of blaming everything on the listener.

The article then introduces an interesting practical test called an “expression stiffness test”:

1. Put a Chinese passage into machine translation from Chinese to English.
2. Translate the English back into Chinese.
3. Check how much of the original meaning and grammar survives.

The more stable the passage remains through this round trip, the higher its expression stiffness.

The article defines several levels:

• If the result becomes unintelligible or confused in tense/person, the stiffness is unqualified.
• If the grammar remains correct and the meaning can mostly be inferred, the stiffness is good.
• If the grammar remains correct and the meaning is equivalent without guessing, the stiffness is excellent.
• If the text returns exactly to the original, the stiffness is perfect.

The practical goal proposed by the article is not exam-style Chinese or classical literary skill, but the ability to almost instinctively write sentences with good expression stiffness.

In short, the article treats language as a compression algorithm for thought: good expression is clear, accurate, robust, and efficient.